In this regard four variables are considered based on previous literature review as safety and pedestrians' facilities, comfortable walking environment, walking connectivity and lastly walking attractiveness. The mix methods include onsite observation, visual survey and questionnaire with students using walkability checklist to determine the walking quality on streets sidewalks. The research approaches to answer the question: to what extent is the University Campus safe and attractive for the students to walk? The research used mix methods and case study approach to achieve study objectives. This study evaluates the quality of walking environment by analyzing both physical features of streets sidewalks and individual perceptions of pedestrians. Yaman Al-Kamaki University Campus as a learning environment needs to be a safe comfortable and accessible place, where students enjoy walking and social interaction. Structured Summary for Submissions to be submittedġ) An introduction (Background), covering background, problem statement, aims and objectives.Ĥ) Conclusions (comprising key outcomes/findings, discussion and lessons learned)ĥ) Highlights (innovation, Impact, outcomes and limitations)
HOW TO MAKE A HISTOGRAM IN TRANSCAD FULL
Mechanical & Mechatronic Engineering.ġ) Each submitted Submissions should be appropriate/relevant to 1 or more of the conference topicsĢ) Every Submissions should contain/include full contact details of all authorsģ) Each Submission should include a summary that is understandable to the readers who have not read the rest of the paper or do not know the practice and its context.Ĥ) The Submission summary should be limited to 200 words.ĥ) The Submission summary should be organized and content key information requested in Section 2 below should be provided.ħ) All Submissions should classify/identify a lead presenter for inclusion in the programmeĢ. Communication & Computer Systems Engineering. Electronic & Control Systems Engineering. Architecture Engineering and Urban Planning & Design. Transportation Engineering & Traffic Planning. Manufacturing & Composite Materials Engineering.
Originality: Does the Submission brings evidence, approaches or new perspectives on a particular subject/area?Īppendix A: ICRIE 2020, Topics of Interest Significance: Is the abstract relevant for its context?ĥ. Quality of Content: Is the Submission well written and understandable for people not familiar with the field?Ĥ. Presentation: Does the Submission track/follow the agreed guidelines for each type of abstract (Appendix B)?ģ. Thematic Relevance: Is the Submission relevant to 1 or more of the Conference topics? (Appendix A)Ģ. Once full program has been agreed the authors are informed of the decision.
The Organizing Committee and the Scientific Committee will revise and comment on proposed draft full program.Ħ. Once all submitted Submissions have been finally scored by potential reviewers, the coordinator(director) will develop draft full program with accepted Submissions in liaison with the ICRIE 2020 conference chairs.ĥ. The Track-editor to inform the potential reviewers when resubmission has been done via OCS.Ĭ) Disagreements: In case of disagreement from the potential reviewers, the Track-editor in liaison with the Director (Coordinator) and the ICRIE 2020 conference Chair will decide.Ĥ. In that case the authors need to resubmit within a week. Advise/Propose a Submission for a recommendation (accept, reject etc.)ī) Submission Revisions: an invitation to author/authors to revise would be sent if agreed and requested by the 2 potential reviewers.Provide/Leave a comment for the Track-editor.Score each Submission using the criteria established by the ICRIE 2020.Submission will be peer reviewed by 2 members registered with ICRIE 2020 via OCS:Ī) OCS offer reviewers the following option: Track-editor will allocate Submission submitted online to 2 potential reviewers based on topic relevance.ģ. Submission is submitted via online tool OCS: Ī) Author to choose Topics of Interest/theme (s) of relevance, following: Ģ. Any additional info on review process: See below:ġ.Total number of reviewers involved: 347.Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 60 %.
HOW TO MAKE A HISTOGRAM IN TRANSCAD PROFESSIONAL
Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors.